Experts criticize the Grangemouth refinery closure as a poor example of energy transition, urging better planning for the future of jobs and communities.
Grangemouth: The closure of the Grangemouth refinery is raising eyebrows. An advisor from the Just Transition Commission called it “a shining example of how not to do anything.”
Richard Hardy pointed out that the way this transition was handled should serve as a lesson. He criticized the UK Government for giving public funds to Ineos owner Jim Ratcliffe, who he claims is cutting jobs and hurting communities.
Alloa and Grangemouth MP Brian Leishman also weighed in, questioning Scotland Secretary Ian Murray about the transition. Hardy mentioned they’ve worked closely with the community and workers at the plant.
He emphasized that Grangemouth is a prime example of what not to do. Promises made by various officials haven’t materialized, which is disappointing.
Hardy stressed the need for honesty and conditions around public funding, especially for wealthy individuals who benefit from taxpayer money while cutting jobs.
He believes high carbon organizations need clear exit plans. It’s not fair to announce job losses with little notice, leaving workers in the lurch.
Sadly, Grangemouth didn’t perform well as a test case for a just transition. The refinery will shut down in the spring after over a century of operation, resulting in the loss of more than 400 skilled jobs.
Leishman warned that failing to address the closure properly would lead to an “unjust transition.” He raised concerns about the timeline for Project Willow and its impact on jobs.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray acknowledged the closure is regrettable but pointed out that previous governments had years to act and didn’t. He mentioned a £100 million growth deal for the area and ongoing support for workers.
It’s a tough situation, and many are hoping for a better outcome for the community.
